Donate

Believers in evil

artur.sumarokov11/09/25 18:02365

The mystical thriller *The Believers*, directed by the esteemed John Schlesinger, stands as a faithful screen adaptation of Nicholas Conde’s 1982 novel *The Religion*, a gripping tale that delves into the shadowy underbelly of ritual child murders plaguing New York City. At its core is the story of Cal Jamison, a rational police psychologist whose world unravels as he confronts the insidious grip of black magic, forcing him against his every instinct to grapple with forces that defy logic and science. Schlesinger’s film meticulously shadows the literary source material, embracing its unflinching gaze into the abyss without flinching from the occasional waves of nauseating naturalism or the suffocating, almost palpable atmosphere of dread that permeates every frame. In lesser hands—a director of more modest caliber, wielding talent that bends too easily toward sensationalism—Conde’s ostensibly boulevard-level plot, rife with occult conspiracies and visceral horrors, might have devolved into outright trash, a lurid spectacle more fitting for late-night cable schlock than the silver screen. Yet Schlesinger, with his pedigree of masterpieces like *Midnight Cowboy* and *Sunday Bloody Sunday*, masterfully teeters on that razor-thin precipice, never quite tumbling over into the chasm of kitsch, bad taste, or gratuitous excess, even as he revels in the exquisite, upoetic brutality that makes the film so memorably unsettling. Even measured against the cinematic landscape of the late 1980s—a decade awash in glossy blockbusters and escalating effects-driven spectacles—or, more pointedly, Schlesinger’s own illustrious career marked by Oscar wins and boundary-pushing narratives, *The Believers* registers as a decidedly middling entry, one that garnered a tepid reception upon its June 1987 release. Critics, ever quick to dissect, dismissed it as derivative or overwrought, with Roger Ebert lambasting it as "awesomely silly, tasteless, and half-witted," while others like Hal Hinson of *The Washington Post* found glimmers of merit in its brooding dread. Box office returns were modest, pulling in just under $19 million against a $13 million budget, and it faded quickly from cultural memory, overshadowed by contemporaries like *Fatal Attraction* or the burgeoning slasher revival. By the yardstick of Schlesinger’s earlier triumphs—films that dissected the human soul with surgical precision and unflinching honesty—this occult-tinged procedural feels like a detour, a genre exercise that prioritizes atmospheric tension over profound psychological excavation. And yet, in the harsh light of retrospect, particularly when stacked against the glut of contemporary mystical dreck churned out by streaming behemoths like Netflix—think the derivative echoes of *Archive 81*, with its half-baked found-footage pretensions and rote jump scares—*The Believers* emerges not merely as competent, but as something verging on revelatory, a relic of analog craftsmanship in an era of algorithmic blandness. To truly appreciate Schlesinger’s sleight of hand, one must first immerse oneself in the film’s labyrinthine plot, a narrative that unfolds like a fever dream in the concrete canyons of Manhattan. Widowed psychologist Cal Jamison (brilliantly embodied by Martin Sheen in one of his most understated yet harrowing performances) relocates from the Midwest to the pulsating heart of New York with his young son, Chris (the wide-eyed Harley Cross), seeking solace after a tragic accident claims his wife. Thrust into a consultancy role with the NYPD, Cal is drawn into a nightmarish investigation: a string of grotesque ritual murders targeting children, their bodies arranged in blasphemous tableaux that whisper of ancient, forbidden rites. What begins as a procedural puzzle—clues etched in blood and feathers, suspects drawn from the city’s immigrant underclass—morphs into a descent into the occult, as Cal uncovers a clandestine network steeped in brujería, the malevolent flip side of Santería, where affluent professionals and desperate seekers alike barter their souls for power, prosperity, and perverse transcendence. Helmed by enigmatic figures like the charismatic Palo (Malick Bowens, exuding a chilling magnetism) and the steely Lt. McTaggert (Robert Loggia, chewing scenery with grizzled authority), the cult’s tendrils snake through high society, ensnaring Cal’s own circle in ways that shatter his worldview. As the summer solstice looms—a date heavy with ritual significance—Cal must navigate a web of deceit, confronting not just external demons but the fragility of his paternal bond and the seductive pull of irrational belief. Schlesinger, ever the storyteller attuned to the rhythms of urban alienation, films these revelations with a deliberate pace, allowing shadows to pool in dimly lit tenements and steam to rise from sewer grates, transforming the familiar skyline into a character unto itself: a modern Babel where old gods stir in the subways. The production of *The Believers* itself mirrors this tension between the rational and the arcane. Adapted by screenwriter Mark Frost (later of *Twin Peaks* fame), the script took over a year to refine, drawing deeply from Conde’s novel while consulting Santería practitioners to authenticate its portrayal of Afro-Caribbean spirituality. Schlesinger, a British auteur with a penchant for exploring the fractures in polite society, insisted on differentiating the film’s benevolent Santería elements—embodied by the wise housekeeper Carmen (Carla Pinza, herself a real-life initiate)—from the corrupting brujería at its core, a choice that lends the narrative a nuanced cultural texture rare in 1980s horror. Shot largely in Toronto to stand in for New York (a budgetary sleight of hand that nonetheless captures the city’s frenetic pulse through savvy location work), the film clocks in at 114 minutes, its runtime a deliberate sprawl that builds unease layer by layer. Cinematographer Robby Müller, fresh off collaborations with Wim Wenders, bathes scenes in a moody palette of bruised blues and feverish yellows, while Brad Fiedel’s score—a throbbing synth pulse laced with tribal percussion—pulses like a ritual drumbeat, underscoring the inexorable march toward apocalypse. These technical flourishes elevate what could have been a rote thriller into a sensory assault, where the grotesque isn’t mere shock value but a mirror reflecting the primal undercurrents of civilized life. At the helm, Schlesinger’s direction is a masterclass in restraint amid excess. Known for his unflinching realism in depicting queer desire (*Sunday Bloody Sunday*) or the grit of American underbelly (*Midnight Cowboy*), here he channels that verisimilitude into the supernatural, grounding the film’s flights of fancy in the mundane horrors of grief and isolation. He never rushes the scares; instead, he savors them, letting a simple motif—a boil erupting into a swarm of spiders on Helen Shaver’s Jessica, Cal’s ill-fated love interest—linger like a psychic scar. Shaver, with her porcelain fragility masking steely resolve, forms a poignant counterpoint to Sheen’s everyman fortitude, their romance a fragile bulwark against encroaching madness. Supporting turns add depth: Jimmy Smits as the conflicted detective Tom Lopez brings a smoldering intensity, hinting at the cultural schisms the film probes, while Harris Yulin and Richard Masur inject bureaucratic skepticism that heightens the stakes. Even bit players, like Elizabeth Wilson as a no-nonsense medical examiner, contribute to an ensemble that feels lived-in, their performances anchoring the escalating absurdity. Thematically, *The Believers* resonates as a meditation on faith’s double edge: the comfort it offers the marginalized versus the fanaticism it unleashes in the privileged. Cal’s arc—from staunch empiricist to reluctant convert—echoes the era’s yuppie anxieties, where Wall Street wolves dabbled in "voodoo economics" while fearing the ethnic "Other" encroaching on their turf. Drawing parallels to *Rosemary’s Baby* in its urban paranoia or *The Possession of Joel Delaney* in its ethnic dread, the film critiques how modernity’s sheen conceals barbaric impulses, with Santería recast not as exotic villainy but as a syncretic faith corrupted by greed. Controversies simmer beneath: some decried its portrayal of Caribbean religions as superstitious threats, a charge echoed in its inadvertent influence on real-world cults like the Matamoros killings. Yet Schlesinger’s touch—subtle, never exploitative—avoids outright xenophobia, instead using the occult to probe universal frailties: the terror of losing control, the seduction of the unseen. In comparison to today’s streaming slogs, *The Believers* shines brighter. Modern fare like *The Ritual* or *His House* gestures toward cultural specificity but often sanitizes it for broad appeal; *The Believers*, unafraid of its queasy naturalism, dives headlong into the ritual’s raw viscera, emerging with a potency that lingers. By late-80s standards, it may lack the polish of *Angel Heart* or the innovation of *Jacob’s Ladder*, but its balance of procedural smarts and supernatural shiver marks it as a sleeper gem, ripe for rediscovery in our algorithm-curated age. Ultimately, *The Believers* endures not despite its flaws—the occasionally creaky twists, the patina of period cheese—but because of Schlesinger’s alchemy in transmuting them into virtues. It’s a film that dares you to suspend disbelief, to feel the chill of unseen eyes in a crowded city, and in doing so, reaffirms cinema’s power to make the impossible feel all too real. In a landscape cluttered with forgettable frights, it stands as a testament to the thrill of the well-worn path trodden with artistry: not a masterpiece, perhaps, but a damn fine haunt that rewards the patient viewer with shivers that settle deep in the bones. *The Believers* operates as a sly allegory for the Reagan-era zeitgeist, where the gospel of self-made success masked a undercurrent of moral decay. Cal Jamison, with his clinical detachment and upward mobility, embodies the archetype of the enlightened professional—divorced from tradition, armored in rationality—only to find his fortress crumbling under the weight of ancestral shadows. The film’s cultists, a motley cabal of lawyers, executives, and socialites, aren’t cartoonish zealots but aspirants twisted by ambition, invoking brujería not out of piety but pragmatism: a dark shortcut to the American Dream. This inversion—where the elite ape the rituals of the oppressed—flips the script on typical horror tropes, critiquing the commodification of spirituality in a materialist society. John Kenneth Muir, in his incisive analysis, posits it as a reflection of "ethnic fears," Manhattan recast as a battleground where white Christian hegemony clashes with the "alien" syncretism of Yoruba-Catholic fusion. Yet Schlesinger, attuned to nuance, humanizes the Santería faithful through Carmen’s quiet wisdom, her herbs and invocations a balm rather than a blight, underscoring the film’s bifurcated view: magic as medicine or malediction, depending on the wielder’s intent. Production lore adds another layer of intrigue. Schlesinger, then in his late 50s and navigating Hollywood’s shifting tides post-*Yanks*, approached the material with a director’s curiosity for the unfamiliar. His collaboration with Frost yielded a script that amplified Conde’s procedural beats while amplifying the personal stakes, transforming a detective yarn into a paternal nightmare. Filming in Toronto’s stand-in streets—rain-slicked alleys doubling for Harlem’s pulse—infused the visuals with a claustrophobic authenticity, Müller’s Steadicam prowls evoking the voyeuristic unease of *Marathon Man*. Anecdotes from the set whisper of Schlesinger’s meticulousness: coaching Sheen through dialect drills to nail the Midwestern transplant’s unease, or consulting Pinza for ritual accuracy, ensuring the film’s Palo Mayombe ceremonies rang true without veering into parody. The spider boil sequence, a standout set piece, was achieved with practical ingenuity—live arachnids coaxed from a latex prop—yielding a visceral payoff that digital remakes could only approximate. Fiedel’s score, blending electronica with conga rhythms, was composed in iterative sessions, Schlesinger insisting on a "heartbeat" motif to mirror Cal’s accelerating dread. Cast dynamics further enriched the brew. Sheen’s portrayal, drawing from his *Apocalypse Now* intensity but tempered with paternal vulnerability, anchors the film’s emotional core; his eyes, hollowed by loss, convey the slow erosion of certainty better than any monologue. Shaver, post-*Desert Hearts*, brings a luminous fragility to Jessica, her arc a tragic foil to Cal’s awakening. Loggia’s bombast as McTaggert provides levity amid the gloom, his world-weary quips a nod to noir forebears like *Chinatown*. Smits, on the cusp of *L.A. Law* stardom, infuses Lopez with brooding authenticity, his character’s cultural liminality bridging the film’s divides. Even younger Cross shines, his innocence a beacon that heightens the horror’s stakes, evoking the child-peril classics of Hitchcock. Films like *The Autopsy of Jane Doe* flirt with ritualistic chills but devolve into formula; *The Believers*, by contrast, sustains its dread through psychological layering, Cal’s therapy sessions doubling as meta-commentary on repression. Even prestige efforts like *Hereditary* echo its familial incursions, yet lack the urban grit that makes Schlesinger’s vision so tactile. In the 1980s canon, it slots uneasily beside *Prince of Darkness*—both probing faith’s fractures—but Schlesinger’s humanism elevates it above Carpenter’s abstraction. Reception’s chill notwithstanding, the film’s legacy simmers in cult circles, its controversies—accusations of cultural insensitivity, links to real narco-rituals—lending it a forbidden allure. Today, as occult narratives proliferate (*Midsommar*, *The Witch*), *The Believers* reminds us of horror’s roots in the everyday uncanny: a father’s fear, a city’s secrets, the thin veil between belief and bedlam. Schlesinger, in balancing revulsion and revelation, crafts not just a thriller but a mirror—disturbing, deft, and disarmingly human. To dismiss it as "passable" is to overlook its quiet sorcery; revisited, it bewitches anew, proving that true fright lies not in monsters, but in the mirrors they hold to our souls.

Author

ShayPop
Comment
Share

Building solidarity beyond borders. Everybody can contribute

Syg.ma is a community-run multilingual media platform and translocal archive.
Since 2014, researchers, artists, collectives, and cultural institutions have been publishing their work here

About